MR3: West Irbid Wastewater Project



Project number:


Business sector:

Municipal and environmental infrastructure

Notice type:


Environmental category:


Approval date:

31 Oct 2017



PSD disclosed:

10 Aug 2017

As per section 1.4.2 (iii) of the Directive on Access to Information: "For Projects approved by Bank management where the Board of Directors has delegated the approval authority, the PSD shall be disclosed at the start of the relevant no-objection notification period to a member country of the Bank in accordance with Article 13 (iii) of the Agreement Establishing the EBRD."

Project Description

An EBRD loan of EUR 25 million, to be co-financed by investment grants of EUR 20 million from the EU's MADAD Fund, USD 2.5 million the Global Concessional Finance Facility and EUR 5.9 million from the EBRD Shareholders Special Fund, to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The funding will finance the construction of a wastewater network in 15 towns in West Irbid governorate, enabling the towns to connect to the wastewater network including to existing wastewater treatment plants (the Project). The transaction is a part of the Bank's wider engagement with the Water Authority Jordan (WAJ), aimed at developing and implementing a comprehensive wastewater investment programme in order to resolve the country's current issues in the sector, caused by the rapid population growth, including an influx of Syrian refugees, which placed unprecedented strain on the wastewater system.

In 2022, the Bank is looking to approve an additional EUR 12 million to the original loan amount of EUR 25 million, thus bringing total EBRD lending up to EUR 37 million in order to close the financing gap that arose due to global price increases and the depreciation of the EUR against USD. 


Project Objectives

The financing package forms part of the EBRD's Municipal Resilience Refugee Response Framework. Irbid governorate is located 83 km north of Amman, with its borders extending to the Jordanian-Syrian borders. The eastern regions of the province include the highway connecting Syria and Jordan, while the western-northern part overlooks the Golan Heights. The proximity of Irbid to the Syrian border has resulted in a significant number of Syrian refugees resettling in the city of Irbid and in the towns surrounding it. The consequent population growth has placed an unprecedented strain on the wastewater network, particularly in the towns lying to the East and West of Irbid which suffer from outdated wastewater collection infrastructure. Improvements will be achieved by providing first time sanitation to residents and thus addressing urgent socio-economic needs of both the local population and the refugee community in the Project area. The improvements are likely to circumvent potential health issues and related economic losses in the Project area.

Transition Impact

ETI score: 60

Infrastructure service financial sustainability through tariff reform: Introduction of municipal water tariff increases (in addition to those introduced as part of the East Zarqa Project) in accordance to the MWI Action Plan to improve sustainability of the operation and maintenance of the water and wastewater infrastructure by reducing the gap between costs and tariff revenues.

Improvements in governance and institutional building: The Bank supported a nationwide benchmarking exercise in Jordan, which was concluded late 2015 and has since supported a regional benchmarking programme, which has further assisted the Jordanian water utilities in their transition through improved benchmarking and performance support as compared to their regional counterparts.

Private sector participation and demonstration effect. The Bank, in coordination with other stakeholders and financiers, will pursue the introduction of private sector O&M to the water and wastewater infrastructure in the North of Jordan to ensure sustainability of the services.

Client Information


Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan

EBRD Finance Summary

EUR 37,000,000.00

Co-financed by investment grants of EUR 20 million from the EU's MADAD Fund, USD 2.5 million the Global Concessional Finance Facility and EUR 5.9 million from the EBRD Shareholders Special Fund.

Total Project Cost

EUR 65,092,150.97

Environmental and Social Summary

Categorised B (ESP, 2014).  The Project is expected to result in environmental and social (E&S) benefits through the provision of first time wastewater network connections to 105,000 people.  Although the construction of the Project may be associated with E&S impacts,  independent E&S due diligence has shown that these impacts are generally site specific, limited and can be readily addressed.  An action plan (ESAP) has been agreed with Water Authority of Jordan (WAJ)to ensure that the Project is constructed and operated in line with the EBRD's E&S requirements.  This ESAP is similar to other ESAPs agreed with the WAJ.

E&S due diligence has been conducted by an independent consultant as part of a feasibility study and included a review of current wastewater practises, an assessment of potential Project E&S impacts, a gender assessment and a review of E&S provisions and management capacities within WAJand its subsidiary, YMC. 

Current wastewater management practices include the use of cess pits and septic tanks.  The Project will replace such infrastructure with a sewage network including household connections. The feasibility study has sought to avoid and reduce E&S impacts through routing the main sewage lines away from developed areas and instead following existing wadis to avoid land acquisition issues and maximise the use of gravity over the need for pump stations.  Land required for the Project is largely state land but WAJwill be required to develop a land acquisition and compensation plan to ensure that land is acquired in line with the Bank's requirements and to avoid and reduce any potential adverse livelihood impacts. While some biodiversity is present in the wadis the sewage lines can be routed to avoid impacts to biodiversity.  Further, the sewage line corridors will be reinstated. Pump stations will also be established away from developed areas to avoid nuisance related impacts.  Local sewage lines will be installed within the villages and have the potential to cause disruption and nuisance impacts.  This activity will, however, be of a temporary nature and managed with appropriate mitigation measures.

The Project will be subject to a local EIA process which will draw on the E&S due diligence and further refine a set of mitigation measures for Project development.  The ESAP also requires the development of an E&S management system for the Project with associated procedures to apply during construction to contractors, including contractor oversight, and during operation.   These procedures will address impacts such as noise and vibration, dust control, site reinstatement, worker and community health and safety and emergency response.

The Project will connect the villages to an existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).  This plant has sufficient capacity to accept current additional wastewater flow but will need to be expanded, or new WWTP developed, to accommodate future projected flows up to 2040.  A review of WWTP performance shows that despite substantial organic loading the WWTP still achieves a level of pollutant reduction required by the EU Urban Wastewater Directive.  It is, however, recommended that additional primary sedimentation is installed. 

The Project will remove the need for cess pits and septic tanks avoiding odour and health issues and potential soil and groundwater impacts.  Moving to a sewage network system will further reduce greenhouse gases (GHG), in the region of 1000 tons of CO2 per year, through the elimination of the need for tankers and the elimination of cess pits.  Further GHG reduction will also be achieved through a move from anaerobic breakdown to aerobic treatment of wastewater.  Total GHG reduction is in the process of being determined. The elimination of tankers and cess pits/septic tanks may result in livelihood impacts to those providing such services.  Avoiding and reducing these impacts will be included in a Project livelihood restoration plan.

The feasibility study has considered affordability issues and confirmed that for average income households tariffs and connection fees are expected to be affordable as they are expected to be cheaper than septic tank services.  For lower income households and vulnerable groups there are likely to be affordability constraints and these can only be addressed through a capital grant, which is planned.

The Project is likely to require a substantial workforce during construction which will exceed local worker availability.  The Project will be required to develop a labour and employment plan including procedures and commitments, and the necessary resources, focussing on such areas as equal opportunities, capacity building, working conditions and labour practices, worker accommodation and health and safety in line with the EBRD's requirements. A Gender Action Plan will need to be developed and will include procedures and commitments related to Equal Opportunities of local and Syrian women as well as raise gender awareness throughout the entire Project. A grievance mechanism will also be required and accessible by all contractors and carried on through to operations.

In order to meet the Bank's requirements for stakeholder engagement and information disclosure, the due diligence included the development of a Stakeholder Engagement Plan.  This will be implemented by Project appointed community liaison officers and includes a grievance mechanism.  Due consideration will be required to ensure that local and Syrian are included in stakeholder engagement activities. An ESAP has been developed for the Project and includes the actions described above to align the Project with the Bank's requirements and mitigate potential E&S impacts.


A Project Procurement, Tender and Implementation Support Consultant has now been appoint and will provided support on E&S matters including implementation of the ESAP and mitigation and management of E&S issues associated with the Project.

Technical Cooperation and Grant Financing


Technical and Environmental Review and Due Diligence: review of the existing studies and gap analysis on both technical and environmental findings and recommendations as well as an Environmental and Social Assessment (E&S due diligence) in-line with EBRD E&S requirements. The cost of the assignment is EUR 320,000, financed by the EBRD Shareholder Special Fund. Completed.


Procurement, Tender and Implementation Support to assist WAJ in tender preparation and Project implementation. Including, supervision engineer and health and safety and ESAP implementation. The cost of this assignment is up to EUR 1.4 million, financed by the Community Resilience Sub Account of the EBRD Shareholder Special Fund.

Benchmarking Programme for phase two of the national benchmarking programme, to assist water utilities improve their performance, ensuring that operations are fully integrated and result in the highest level of operating efficiency. The cost of the assignment is EUR 110,000, financed by the Transition Fund. Completed.

Company Contact Information

Iyad Dahiyat

PSD last updated

27 Sep 2022

Understanding Transition

Further information regarding the EBRD’s approach to measuring transition impact is available here.

Business opportunities

For business opportunities or procurement, contact the client company.

For business opportunities with EBRD (not related to procurement) contact:

Tel: +44 20 7338 7168

For state-sector projects, visit EBRD Procurement:

Tel: +44 20 7338 6794

General enquiries

Specific enquiries can be made using the EBRD Enquiries form.

Environmental and Social Policy (ESP)

The ESP and the associated Performance Requirements (PRs) set out the ways in which the EBRD implements its commitment to promoting “environmentally sound and sustainable development”.  The ESP and the PRs include specific provisions for clients to comply with the applicable requirements of national laws on public information and consultation as well as to establish a grievance mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of stakeholders’ concerns and grievances, in particular, about environmental and social performance of the client and the project. Proportionate to the nature and scale of a project’s environmental and social risks and impacts, the EBRD additionally requires its clients to disclose information, as appropriate, about the risks and impacts arising from projects or to undertake meaningful consultation with stakeholders and consider and respond to their feedback.

More information on the EBRD’s practices in this regard is set out in the ESP.

Integrity and Compliance

The EBRD's Office of the Chief Compliance Officer (OCCO) promotes good governance and ensures that the highest standards of integrity are applied to all activities of the Bank in accordance with international best practice. Integrity due diligence is conducted on all Bank clients to ensure that projects do not present unacceptable integrity or reputational risks to the Bank. The Bank believes that identifying and resolving issues at the project assessment approval stages is the most effective means of ensuring the integrity of Bank transactions. OCCO plays a key role in these protective efforts, and also helps to monitor integrity risks in projects post-investment.

OCCO is also responsible for investigating allegations of fraud, corruption and misconduct in EBRD-financed projects. Anyone, both within or outside the Bank, who suspects fraud or corruption should submit a written report to the Chief Compliance Officer by email to All matters reported will be handled by OCCO for follow-up. All reports, including anonymous ones, will be reviewed. Reports can be made in any language of the Bank or of the Bank's countries of operation. The information provided must be made in good faith.

Access to Information Policy (AIP)

The AIP sets out how the EBRD discloses information and consults with its stakeholders so as to promote better awareness and understanding of its strategies, policies and operations following its entry into force on 1 January 2020. Please visit the Access to Information Policy page to find out what information is available from the EBRD website.

Specific requests for information can be made using the EBRD Enquiries form.

Independent Project Accountability Mechanism (IPAM)

If efforts to address environmental, social or public disclosure concerns with the Client or the Bank are unsuccessful (e.g. through the Client’s Project-level grievance mechanism or through direct engagement with Bank management), individuals and organisations may seek to address their concerns through the EBRD’s Independent Project Accountability Mechanism (IPAM).

IPAM independently reviews Project issues that are believed to have caused (or to be likely to cause) harm. The purpose of the Mechanism is: to support dialogue between Project stakeholders to resolve environmental, social and public disclosure issues; to determine whether the Bank has complied with its Environmental and Social Policy or Project-specific provisions of its Access to Information Policy; and where applicable, to address any existing non-compliance with these policies, while preventing future non-compliance by the Bank.

Please visit the Independent Project Accountability Mechanism webpage to find out more about IPAM and its mandate; how to submit a Request for review; or contact IPAM  via email to get guidance and more information on IPAM and how to submit a request.


Share this page: