|
Abstract
Regulatory reform in the power sector of most transition economies has
progressed. Regulatory independence, however, is still limited with direct
(statutory) and indirect political input influencing decision making. Further
reform is required to secure power tariff increases and private sector
participation. Both should improve sector performance, notwithstanding current
market sentiment towards the sector and the region. This paper discusses the
advances made in regulatory reform, with a focus on end user regulation rather
than network access. It suggests that regulatory rules, enforceable in an
independent forum such as international arbitration, should be written into
contracts to ensure investor security. However, arbitration should not be seen
as a substitute for strong government commitment to the reform process. Tariff
mechanisms from western Europe or North America, if adopted into contracts,
should also be adapted to reflect the specific characteristics of transition
economies. For example, poor payments discipline and exchange rate risk are
significant problems in CIS countries. Going forward, the challenge in all
transition economies will be to strengthen regulatory independence and
mechanism design. And, perhaps most importantly, implementation must be
enhanced to improve sector performance.
|