|
How do Russians assess the past 16 years since the collapse of the Soviet
Union and what is their outlook for the future?
Three research efforts publicised today at the EBRD’s Annual Meeting show
that, looking back, what Russians most appreciate about the Soviet era is the
stability it afforded. Looking at life today, what they prize most are the
opportunities available in the new Russia.
The Life in Transition (LiT) survey undertaken by the EBRD and the World Bank
provides statistical analysis of public opinion polls conducted in Russian
cities and in other transition countries in 2006. Survey respondents were
asked directly about their attitudes to things that affect their lives and
about their general level of satisfaction or happiness. Additional data was
gleaned through the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (see slides).
In addition, this spring the EBRD commissioned the Moscow-based Institute for
Comparative Social Research to conduct 34 focus groups in nine cities, from
Vladivostok to St Petersburg to Rostov-on-Don, to converse with everyday
Russians about their attitudes and aspirations regarding their recent past,
their present and their future. These results, published as the Russian
Attitudes and Aspirations study (see summary), were inspired by data from the
LiT survey in Russia.
All three came together today in an Annual Meeting panel discussion on Russian
public opinion, titled The view from the ground: which way is up? Anna
Andreenkova, co-director of the Moscow-based Institute for Comparative Social
Research, discussed the results of the focus group sessions. Ekaterina
Zhuravskaya, associate professor of economics at the New Economic School and
academic director of the Centre for Economic and Financial Research,
elaborated on the RLMS findings. It was moderated by Stephen Dalziel, former
BBC World Service Russian affairs analyst.
According to the focus group study, what Russians like best about their
country today is the economic and political stability it currently enjoys.
What worries them most: low living standards, corruption and the decline in
health care and education.
The research shows that younger and better-off Russians are more positive
about the present vis-à-vis the Soviet past than are older people with less
promising financial prospects. But even the latter agreed that the new Russia
offers greater opportunities for hard-working, talented, educated people than
did Soviet Russia. Regardless of age or income, the ideal in Russia today is
to achieve a middle-class, western European standard of living, with a steady
income, a car and a home of one’s own with a computer, TV, etc.
All the same, many Russians “mythologise” the Soviet past, as Dr Andreenkova
put it with regard to the fondness many Russians express for the certainties
of the old system.
Dr Zhuravskaya concurred. “If you ask people if they trusted each other more
in Soviet times, they will say ‘yes’, but after a while they start remembering
reporting to the police, the KGB.” Similarly, she said, while many people
would like prices to be set by the state as they were in USSR times, they have
forgotten that such centralised economic control meant shortages and lack of
choice in shops.
Asked whether the Russians in her focus groups who pine for the Soviet days
actually experienced those days, Dr Andreenkova mused, “They had experience
with it, yes, but they know longer know the Soviet Union. Today the Soviet
Union is so far detached, it is a faraway land of the golden age…where we
probably never lived.” In fact, she said, what they think they had in the past
is actually what they long for in the future.
All the same, the Soviet Union as a point of reference is receding, the two
said. “It’s no longer as important,” said Dr Andreenkova. “People reflect back
more to the 1990s” when assessing whether today is good or bad.
There were many seeming contractions in the surveys. For example, there was
the widespread view that state intervention in the economy is a good thing
(particularly regarding ownership and exploitation of natural resources),
while at the same time many respondents expressed deep mistrust of state
institutions. Added to this is the overriding concern about corruption.
“One gets the impression the people want to just hand over their lives to the
government,” said Dr Zhuravskaya. However, she doesn’t believe this is the
case. She explained that Russians want officials to assume their
responsibility to manage state assets honestly and for citizens’ benefit.
By Kate Dunn, Senior Communications Adviser
20 May 2007
|