|
|
|
|

Former Italian Prime Minister Giuliano Amato on the Balkans and EU integration. |

Jacques de Larosiere lecture at the EBRD 2005 Annual Meeting. |
It will be cheaper in the long run for the European Union to welcome Balkan
states as members than to deal with the instability that will result if they
are not made Union members, former Italian Prime Minister Giuliano Amato said
in closing the EBRD’s 2005 Annual Meeting in Belgrade, Serbia.
In delivering the annual Jacques de Larosière lecture, the chairman of the
International Commission on the Balkans delivered his prescription for
averting a return to the western Balkan’s recent past of political
instability, armed conflict and economic deterioration.
“Let me say that the region is much better off than 10 years ago when the
Dayton Peace accords were signed,” between countries of ex-Yugoslavia. “The
progress has been remarkable. In several parts – not everywhere – we’re back
to normal. Countries are run by governments that respond to Parliament.
Democratic regimes are taking root.”
He mentioned that during his tours of the Balkans as Commission chair, he had
met some Bosnian students who were discussing the 1990s conflicts between
Croatia, Bosnia and Serbia. “One wanted to argue about who started the war.
After a while another one said, ‘Who cares?’ They know they cannot live
forever animated by their past. History is one thing. Political struggles of
today and tomorrow have to be something else.”
Cooling the past
He said that during those Balkan tours he had expected the economy would be
the main focus of politicians, commentators and everyday people. On the
contrary, he said, they still tend to focus on “status, interethnic
relations…and cheering on or condemning the authors of crimes of the past.
“This means the past, with its passion and anti-integration sentiments,
dominates the future. Opening the future requires that they cool the
temperature of the past.”
Economic growth would help achieve this, and key to economic growth for this
region is the prospect of joining the European Union. That prospect is closer
to reality for some Balkan states than for others. He said bluntly that in
2006 the EU should establish the roadmap for accession for all those countries
with real hopes of membership.
Once the EU delivers an accession roadmap to a candidate country, that state
receives injections of EU funding, improvements in its reputation among
foreign investors, and has to implement difficult but necessary reforms which,
without EU membership clearly in sight, might be thwarted by negative public
opinion.
“The countries that are quite a bit farther ahead in the accession process
have per capita growth that is significantly higher than countries that are
outside waiting,” said Dr Amato. Yet it is those accession-states-in-waiting
that need the money most, and immediately, he argued, to encounter high levels
of unemployment that promote unrest and conflict. He equated EU development
funds with the post-World War II Marshall Plan that helped rebuild western
Europe’s economies.
Courage required
Mr Amato dwelled at length on the upcoming referenda France and the
Netherlands will hold on the new EU Constitution. A ‘No’ vote will be
interpreted as a desire to put the brakes on further EU expansion. He said EU
leaders needed “courage” to counter anti-expansion sentiment, as EU membership
is the main hope for stability in the Balkans. “Weak economies foster
instability which leads to radical political options that tend to fall into
the past.”
Both Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo have been governed for many years by the
international community, led by the European Union. Dr Amato said the time was
ripe to stop what was developing into a ‘colonising’ presence. He expects the
Office of the High Commissioner in Bosnia to be downgraded very soon to that
of a high-powered EU ambassador. He also expects the thorny question of
Kosovo’s status to be resolved by year-end.
Only the greater goal of joining the European Union is likely to bring
stability to these countries, he said. “Our leaders in western Europe have to
find the courage to speak to their electorate” in favour of enlargement, he
said.
“We spend 25 per cent more money and have committed more troops to Kosovo than
we have to Afghanistan. Do we want to do so only to transform ourselves into a
colonial power? Or would it be better to devote these resources to the more
acceptable goal of economic growth, democratic stability and new members of
Europe?”
“This region has the potential to be a prosperous part of a prosperous Europe.”
Written by EBRD Senior Writer Kate Dunn.
26 May 2005
|