EBRD homepage
About the EBRD
News & events
 
Press releases

Feature stories

Speeches & articles

Multimedia

Calendar of events

Annual meeting

Email alerts & news feeds
Publications
Countries & topics
Projects
Apply for financing
Environment
Capital markets
EBRD blog
Working together
 

 

Press release

27 November 2006

Subscribe to press release email alerts
Related links
Tajikistan homepage
Agribusiness homepage

Workshop on rural and agricultural finance in Tajikistan

A two-day workshop in the Tajik capital Dushanbe organised by the EBRD will look into ways of expanding rural and agricultural finance in the central Asian country. Given the importance of the agricultural sector for the Tajik economy, improved access to loans and other financial services is crucial for farmers, food processors and related businesses. Building on its efforts to enhance micro, small and medium enterprise finance in urban areas, the EBRD is looking into ways to expand rural and agricultural finance.

The Bank has requested the FAO to undertake a feasibility study assessing the demand for and supply of rural and agricultural lending and to identify options for enhancing such finance. The key findings of this study will be presented and discussed during two workshops:

The first workshop, to be held on November 28, is targeted at senior government officials, donors and senior management of financial institutions. The workshop will also be used to share existing experiences in agricultural lending and to discuss issues and options for expanding rural and agricultural finance. Information on current and planned initiatives in rural/agricultural finance and agricultural/agribusiness development will be shared in order to foster synergies and identify gaps

The second workshop, to be held on November 29, will have be more technical, targeting operational staff of banks and MFIs involved in agricultural lending. Participants include branch managers, loan officers and staff charged with practical lending, related market research and product design. The purpose is to share experiences of different participants in rural and agricultural lending, discuss key issues and challenges as well as ways of addressing them.

The FAO study found a significant gap between supply and demand of rural and agricultural finance, both in qualitative and quantitative terms. Bank lending to the non-cotton agricultural sector is quite limited and mainly directed towards medium and large state and collective farms. Most lending is short term and thus not suitable for financing much-needed investments in productive assets such as farm machinery, irrigation equipment, etc. Most MFIs target the bottom end of the market using group lending approaches. These loans are typically for by small amounts, have short repayment periods, frequent instalments and entail high costs. Due to these product features, most MFI loans finance activities with a quick turnover, such as cattle fattening, small trade, etc. However, several MFIs have started introducing larger individual loans for more progressive small-scale producers.

Although more than half of the country’s non-cotton agricultural output has been produced on household plots, future production increases will mainly come from small and medium sized farms. This market segment has currently least access to loans. In order to meet this demand, banks have to downscale their lending operations and redesign their products and procedures. Cash-flow based loan appraisal, flexible collateral requirements and streamlined loan application procedures should be key elements of loan products targeting the small and medium farming market. MFIs should continue introducing more flexible loan products with increased ceilings on amounts and more personalised repayment schedules, the study says.

The sustained expansion of rural and agricultural finance requires continued efforts by policy makers and donors to tackle structural constraints beyond the financial sector: Outstanding issues include: i) the reform of the cotton sector and restructuring of cotton debt; ii) further progress in land reform in order to enhance the security and tradability of land rights and to establish viable farm structures; iii) an enabling legal and institutional framework for secured transactions including the mortgaging of rural land, iv) better integration and coordination of different participants (producers, traders, processors and exporters) in non-cotton value chains such as fruit and vegetables, dairy, etc.